close

前陣子跟同事想要購買Old Futures- Speculative Fiction and Queer Possibility，

所以想說上網參考網友們對Old Futures- Speculative Fiction and Queer Possibility的心得分享，

後來經過我在網路上參考搜尋Old Futures- Speculative Fiction and Queer Possibility的結果，

發現網友們居然一致推薦在這裡購買Old Futures- Speculative Fiction and Queer Possibility，

原來在這裡購買Old Futures- Speculative Fiction and Queer Possibility居然便宜那麼多，CP值也未免太高了吧！

以下是我撿好康的商品網址，分享給大家，網址如下： http://bit.ly/2NUXFVh

我今天要分享的東西是：

Old Futures- Speculative Fiction and Queer Possibility



來看看比原價更便宜的網址：http://adcenter.conn.tw/2DJ2X

商品訊息功能：

商品訊息描述：
Traverses the history of imagined futures from the 1890s to the 2010s, interweaving speculative visions of gender, race, and sexuality from literature, film, and digital media
?
Old Futures explores the social, political, and cultural forces feminists, queer people, and people of color invoke when they dream up alternative futures as a way to imagine transforming the present. Lothian shows how queer possibilities emerge when we practice the art of speculation: of imagining things otherwise than they are and creating stories from that impulse. Queer theory offers creative ways to think about time, breaking with straight and narrow paths toward the future laid out for the reproductive family, the law-abiding citizen, and the believer in markets. Yet so far it has rarely considered the possibility that, instead of a queer present reshaping the ways we relate to past and future, the futures imagined in the past can lead us to queer the present.?
?
Narratives of possible futures provide frameworks through which we understand our present, but the discourse of “the” future has never been a singular one. Imagined futures have often been central to the creation and maintenance of imperial domination and technological modernity; Old Futures offers a counterhistory of works that have sought––with varying degrees of success––to speculate otherwise. Examining speculative texts from the 1890s to the 2010s, from Samuel R. Delany to Sense8, Lothian considers the ways in which early feminist utopias and dystopias, Afrofuturist fiction, and queer science fiction media have insisted that the future can and must deviate from dominant narratives of global annihilation or highly restrictive hopes for redemption.
?
Each chapter chronicles some of the means by which the production and destruction of futures both real and imagined takes place: through eugenics, utopia, empire, fascism, dystopia, race, capitalism, femininity, masculinity, and many kinds of queerness, reproduction, and sex. Gathering stories of and by populations who have been marked as futureless or left out by dominant imaginaries, Lothian offers new insights into what we can learn from efforts to imaginatively redistribute the future.
?






商品訊息簡述：
  • 作者： Lothian, Alexis
  • 原文出版社：New York Univ Pr
  • 出版日期：2018/09/25
  • 語言：英文




Old Futures- Speculative Fiction and Queer Possibility

商品完整網址：http://adcenter.conn.tw/2DJ2X

民進黨 30 日正式通過徵召綠委姚文智參選台北市長，前總統陳水扁透過「新勇哥物語」發文指出，姚文智的民調目前還落後一大截，「贏的策略只能鞏固基本盤。」

「新勇哥物語」- 122 全文如下：

勇弟：蔡總統兼主席在民進黨中執會通過徵召提名姚文智參選台北市長後，滿心歡喜接見姚委員。對姚文智來說，漫長的等待，遲來的提名，終於有了圓滿的結果。同樣做過阿扁政府新聞局長的林佳龍與鄭文燦都已當選台中市、桃園市兩都市長，如今也該輪到姚文智了！所謂好酒沉甕底，姚文智最後成為台灣國都台北市長，也是應該的更是公平的。獲得黨的提名後，姚文智矢志當選，不是說說而已，每個人都是最佳助選員、最不可或缺的競選總幹事。勇哥，如果你是操盤手，姚文智贏的策略又在哪裡？

勇哥：最重要的是不能「假提名、真放水」，在蔡主席卓越帶領下，民進黨全黨上下不分派系，無論禮讓派或自提派，都能捐棄成見，團結力量大！千萬不要再發生 2014 年新北市長選舉，新系操盤手以游錫堃民調嚴重落後，主席答應最後二天兩場造勢晚會及陪同掃街拜票行程臨時取消，卻跑去彰化新系候選人魏明谷的場子，形同放游錫堃鴿子，開票結果只輸2萬4千票，多麼可惜！

勇弟：聽說未被提名的呂副人在國外要跟民進黨說 bye ! 會不會是姚文智參選的另一個變數？阿扁會跟進嗎？

勇哥：希望這不是真的！也盼蔡主席能夠親自慰留呂副！阿扁深愛民進黨，永遠感念民進黨的栽培養育，才有機會擔任黨公職，擴大為民服務，阿扁不會跟進。倒是要注意呂副如真的退黨，會不會以獨立人士身分投入台北市長選舉？

勇弟：時代力量的黃國昌委員認為姚文智要多談理念與政見，你覺得呢？

勇哥：黃委員說的沒錯，問題是台北市長選舉談政見與理念有用嗎？ 1998 年台北市長選舉結束後的《聯合報》民調，阿扁的施政滿意度還有 76% ，卻只有46%的得票率，阿扁的連任失利顯然不是因為市長做不好！謝長廷、宋楚瑜、蘇貞昌的城市治理能力，以及亮麗的政績，絕對不會輸給郝龍斌，為什麼謝宋蘇就是贏不了台北市長選舉？即使以黃國昌選上汐止地區的委員為例，如果沒有民進黨的禮讓會贏嗎？有人說黃贏在太陽花學運，但 2014 年 3 月 18 日前一年，這些學運青年已經在做反服貿的抗爭，又有誰知道？假如沒有占領國會殿堂引發政治效應，又假如沒有馬王政爭，會有太陽花的後續發展嗎？

勇弟：阿扁寫過與總統大選有關的《 45% 與 5% 的選擇》文章，意思就是說，民進黨在總統大選的基本盤 45% ，為了能夠過半當選，是把原來的45%放著，只爭另外的5%，結果5%拿不到，原來的 % 又不保；還是為了增加 5% ，先固守 45% 的基本盤，再靠這 45% 去拉另外的 5% ，所謂「基本盤極大化」？

勇哥：謝長廷是前者，阿扁則是後者。姚文智贏的策略究竟要學謝還是學陳？ 24 年阿扁選市長的民調一路領先，可以高唱快樂希望；今天姚文智的民調還落後一大截，贏的策略只能鞏固基本盤。



#NEWS_CONTENT_2#

#NEWS_CONTENT_3#

本圖文為原權利人所有,引用者為推廣公司轄下推廣會員,與該原權利人有直接或間接廣告合作關係,若有侵犯之處請盡速通知本站,隨即修正或移除


1CCBF6DAB589F9A9
arrow
arrow
    全站熱搜

    aa652y9 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()